Legal Opinion

Horney v. Meredith Swimming Pool Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1966No. 691PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

For purposes of this appeal, we assume, as do the parties in their briefs, (1) that Horney and Pool Company were subject to and bound by the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act; (2) that Horney was fatally injured by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment by Pool Company; and (3) that the complaint (sufficiently) alleges Horney’s injury and death were proximately caused by the negligence of defendants.

Plaintiff seeks to recover under G.S. 28-173 which, in pertinent part, provides: “When the death of a person is caused by a wrong ful act, neglect or default of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Conrad v. Cook-Lewis Foundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Vause v. Vause Farm Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Burgess Ex Rel. Burgess v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Atchison v. MaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  5. Shanahan v. . Monarch Engineering Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Wood v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Raftery v. Wm. C. Vick Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Buser v. Southern Food Service, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1999
  5. Skinner v. WhitleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API