Legal Opinion
Grotto v. Herbert
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided May 1, 2002No. 9:98-cv-00627PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
HURD, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On April 20, 1998, petitioner Louis Grotto (“petitioner” or “Grotto”) filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 24, 2001, United States Magistrate Judge Gary L. Sharpe filed a ReporNRecommendation which recommended dismissal of the petition. Petitioner filed objections to the Report-Recommendation on February 6, 2001, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The respondent did not reply to the objections. The matter was received without oral argument.
II. FACTS
The following are the facts…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Louis Grotto v. Victor Herbert, Superintendent, Collins Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003