Legal Opinion
In Re: Jerry J. Anderson
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided January 21, 2005No. 05-10045PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARCUS, Circuit Judge:
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255 and 2244(b)(3)(A), as amended by §§ 105 and 106 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), Jerry J. Anderson, proceeding pro se, has filed an application seeking an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Such authorization may be granted only if this Court certifies that the second or successive motion contains a claim involving:(1) newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. Matthew Mark MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Victor Varela v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Dudley Bryant, Jr. v. Warden, FCC Coleman - MediumCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Nicole Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.