Legal Opinion

Lane v. Minnesota State Agricultural Society

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 28, 1896No. Nos. 10,236—(154)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Bamsey county, Brill, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtStabt, C. J.

This is the second appeal in this case. See 62 Minn. 175, 64 N. W. 382. The action was brought to recover from the defendant damages for injuries received by the plaintiff, while riding' in a running race at the State Fair held September 10, 1891, by reason of the negligence of the defendant. The plaintiff had a verdict for $3,000, and the defendant appealed from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

The specific act of negligence which is the basis of plaintiff’s cause of action is that the defendant knowingly permitted a vicious and dangerous horse known as “Isaac B.,” a track bolter,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lane v. Minnesota State Agricultural SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. Steffenson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Delude v. St. Paul City Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Bedal v. SpurrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  5. Carroll v. WillistonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Verdi v. Helper State BankUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Manahan v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API