Legal Opinion

Steffenson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 14, 1892PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by defendant the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Eailway Company, from an order of the District Court of Mower County, Farmer, J., made May 17, 1892, denying its motion for a new trial. After a new trial of this action was granted, 48 Minn. 285, the issues were again tried March 16, 1892. The facts proved were substantially the same as on the preceding trial.

Read the full summary

Appeal by defendant the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Eailway Company, from an order of the District Court of Mower County, Farmer, J., made May 17, 1892, denying its motion for a new trial. After a new trial of this action was granted, 48 Minn. 285, the issues were again tried March 16, 1892. The facts proved were substantially the same as on the preceding trial. At the close of the evidence, the plaintiff requested the judge to embody in his charge to the jury six different requests which he handed up in writing. The judge did so, and the record states: “Thereupon the defendant’s counsel…

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

This action has been before us on two former appeals. See 45 Minn. 355, (47 N. W. Rep. 1068,) and 48 Minn. 285, (51 N. W. Rep. 610.) In the decision last cited the nature of the case is stated, and need not be here repeated. ' At the last trial, which we are now called upon to review, a verdict was rendered for • the plaintiff, based upon the alleged negligence of the plaintiff’s fellow servant, Connors, who, as is determined by the verdict, pushed the plaintiff off the hand car when he (Connors) was applying the brake to stop the car. The chief contention on this appeal is whether the case…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Shannon v. Judges of District Court of Eleventh Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Steffenson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  3. Steffenson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  4. Carroll v. WillistonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Shannon v. Judges of District Court of Eleventh Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Van Doren v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Davis v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. McMahon v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. State v. HenspeterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API