Legal Opinion
Buffalo Forge Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 5, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMacGregor, J.
This case was tried before the court and a jury at the January term of this court. At the conclusion of the trial it was stipulated between the counsel that the jury might be discharged; that the issues be submitted to the court and that the court might direct a verdict in the absence of the jury with the same force and effect as though the jury were present.
The action is brought by the plaintiff to recover from the defendant the sum of $2,428.96, the contract price of materials sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the Kentucky Plumbing and Heating Company. The latter company entered into a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Guaranty Co. v. Pressed Brick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- United States Mortgage & Trust Co. v. RugglesNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. LipowiczNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Standard Oil Co. of N.J. v. National Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United States Gypsum Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Franke v. WiltschekCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Ill-Mo Contractors, Inc. v. Aalcan Demolition & Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Franke v. WiltschekCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953