Legal Opinion

Stout v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1976No. KCD 28267PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TURNAGE, Presiding Judge.

Joe Ray Stout filed a pro se motion pursuant to Rule 27.26. This was followed by an amended motion filed by his appointed counsel. The court disposed of the pro se motion' by finding it was conclusionary in nature and raised no factual issues that could not be determined and adjudicated from the records and files of the court. The court found an evidentiary hearing on such petition was not required and further found from a review of the motion, together with the court’s records and files, that such motion was without merit, and overruled the same.

On the amended motion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  2. Hogshooter v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. WarnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Baker v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Tillman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Cox v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Morgan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Hartrum v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API