Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1978No. 40356PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Judge.

Movant Theodore Roosevelt Johnson (hereafter “defendant”) has appealed the summary denial of his Rule 27.26 motion wherein he challenged his conviction for murder and lesser offenses. On direct appeal this court affirmed. State v. Johnson, 539 S.W.2d 493 (1976).

On this appeal defendant raises two related points: That the trial court erred by failing to appoint counsel to represent him on his motion and failed to make findings of fact and conclusions of law. (Rule 27.-26(h), (i) and (j)). The determinative issue is whether defendant’s motion alleged facts which warranted an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Francis v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  4. State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Hemphill v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bryant v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Ross v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Theodore Roosevelt Johnson, Jr. v. Donald WyrickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  4. Johnson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Windle v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API