Legal Opinion
Robert Skagerberg v. State of Oklahoma
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 25, 1986No. 86-1293PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Per curiam
In accordance with 10th Cir.R. 9(e) and Fed.R.App.P. 34(a), this appeal came on for consideration on the briefs and record on appeal.
This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma denying petitioner a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for failure to exhaust his claims. We conclude we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal.
The district court entered its order denying § 2254 relief on January 8, 1986. On January 15, 1986, petitioner filed a single document which he denominated as a “Motion for Rule 60 Relief, or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Tom Venable v. T.J. HaislipCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Clinton F. Miller v. Leavenworth-Jefferson Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Banister v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Aybar v. Crispin-ReyesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Hatfield v. Board Of County Commissioners For Converse CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Global NAPs, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Sue C. Wagoner, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Robert J. Wagoner, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.