Legal Opinion
Toensing v. U.S. Department of Justice
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 13, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-1215PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Victoria Toensing and Joseph diGenova bring this action against the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552 et seq., seeking injunctive relief. The plaintiffs seek agency records relating to a criminal investigation performed by the United States Attorneys’ Office for the District of Delaware (“Delaware USAO”) in which the plaintiffs were subpoenaed to testify before a grand jury. Pending before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Rodosvaldo Pozo v. Gary McCaughtry Randall Gerritson, and David HautamakiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Safecard Services, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- National Security Counselors v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Odland v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Toensing v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Gamboa v. Executive Office for United States AttorneysDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- James Madison Project v. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.