Gauntlett v. Kelley
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENSLEN, District Judge.
The petitioner in this case, Roger A. Gauntlett, filed a Petition for Writ of Habe-as Corpus on November 12, 1986, in which he essentially requests the Court to declare illegal his sentence of September 21, 1984 and to allow him to serve a probationary sentence of five years, absent the unlawful condition that he submit to treatment with the drug Depo-Provera. Petitioner raises three grounds in support of his petition. First, he argues that prosecutorial misconduct deprived him of his due process right to a fundamentally fair sentencing. Secondly, he argues that…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Roger A. Gauntlett v. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Jones v. HollinsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1995
- United States v. CrowderDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1996
- State v. BrunaNebraska Court of Appeals · 2006