Legal Opinion

Gauntlett v. Kelley

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided April 30, 1987No. K86-447PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ENSLEN, District Judge.

The petitioner in this case, Roger A. Gauntlett, filed a Petition for Writ of Habe-as Corpus on November 12, 1986, in which he essentially requests the Court to declare illegal his sentence of September 21, 1984 and to allow him to serve a probationary sentence of five years, absent the unlawful condition that he submit to treatment with the drug Depo-Provera. Petitioner raises three grounds in support of his petition. First, he argues that prosecutorial misconduct deprived him of his due process right to a fundamentally fair sentencing. Secondly, he argues that…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roger A. Gauntlett v. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. Jones v. HollinsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1995
  3. United States v. CrowderDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1996
  4. State v. BrunaNebraska Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API