Legal Opinion

State v. Bradshaw

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1916No. 3,848PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Cutter County; Daniel L. O’Sern, Judge. W. J. Bradshaw was convicted of the crime of resisting an officer while the latter was in discharge of his duties, and, from the judgment and order denying new trial, he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly

The defendant, having been charged with the crime of resisting a public officer while the latter was in the discharge of his duty in attempting to arrest the defendant, was convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment in the county jail and to pay a fine. He has appealed from the judgment and an order denying his motion for a new trial. He assails the validity of the conviction on the grounds that the information does not state a public offense, that the court erred to his prejudice in its rulings upon questions of evidence and in its instructions to the jury, and that the verdict is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Buford v. HoutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Sandford v. NicholsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
  3. Sanders v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. Miers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  5. Appling v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. MobleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Rodgers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. State ex rel. Sadler v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Ware v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. People v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API