Legal Opinion · Dissent

Karp v. Zoning Board

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 2, 1968Published

1DissentHouse, J.

I cannot agree with the majority opinion in this case.

The authority granted to Stamford to adopt zoning regulations (Stamford Charter §550; 26 Spec. Laws 1234) is similar to that prescribed in § 8-2 of the General Statutes. That authority is, in general, to zone the municipality so as to promote the general welfare and to encourage the most appropriate use of land, not to accord recognition to the status or the identity of the individual user. Del Buono v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 143 Conn. 673, 679, 124 A.2d 915; State ex rel. LaVoie v. Building Commission, 135 Conn. 415, 419, 65 A.2d 165;…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lyman v. AdornoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  2. State ex rel. Higgins v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. St. John's Roman Catholic Church Corp. v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  4. State v. CullumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  5. Shelton v. City of SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API