Legal Opinion
Henderson v. Arundel Corporation
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided December 22, 1966No. 4777, 4944, 4943, 4945PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATKINS, District Judge.
In the above entitled four companion cases thirty-five libellants, members of the crew of the Dredge Lyon owned, operated and controlled by respondent The Arundel Corporation (Arundel), by libels in personam seek to recover from Arundel and from Elder Dempster, a foreign corporation which owned, operated or controlled the M/S PRAHSU, damages for loss of approximately six weeks’ wages, maintenance (subsistence) and overtime from February 1, 1963 in the aggregate sum of $70,000.00, each libellant claiming damages individually in the sum of $2,000.00. This is libellant…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. FlintSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Hopkins v. Southern California Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Carbone v. Ursich the Del RioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Louisiana ex rel. Guste v. M/V TestbankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Miller Industries, Cross-Appellants v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., Burford Equipment Co., Defendant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- State of Louisiana v. TestbankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Manetas v. International Petroleum Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Reefer Queen Co., Inc. v. MARINE CONSTR. AND DESIGN CO.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.