Legal Opinion

Beeber v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1926No. Appeal, 405PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

The combined holdings of defendant and certain relatives of his were considerably more than a majority of the stock of a corporation, which owned and operated a large office building in the City of Philadelphia. Defendant was the president and a director of the company, his brother was secretary, treasurer and a director thereof, and his other relatives completed the board of directors, with the exception that one of the board was an employee of defendant. Plaintiff was a minority stockholder.

While the status was as stated, defendant, on behalf of himself and his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. SeltzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  2. Porter v. HealySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  3. Cowan v. Pennsylvania Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  4. White v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Schipper Bros. Coal Mining Co. v. Economy Domestic Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Thomas P. Knapp v. Bankers Securities Corporation Appeal of Bankers Securities CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  2. Selheimer v. Manganese Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Eshleman v. KeenanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1937
  4. Sale v. Ambler (Emmett)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Cochran v. ShetlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API