Legal Opinion

Charles D. Fox v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 1, 1960No. 216-59PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURFEE, Judge.

This case presents the question of whether or not a lump-sum readjustment payment under the provisions of section 265(a) of the Armed Forces Reserve Act of 1952, 66 Stat. 481, as amended, 70 Stat. 517, 50 U.S.C.A. § 1016, is payable to a reservist who is involuntarily released from further active duty as a commissioned officer and immediately re ports for active duty as a Regular Army warrant officer without any break in service.

Following a period of several years of enlisted service in the National Guard, plaintiff was ordered to active duty with the Army as a second…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Otoe and Missouria Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Selman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  2. Abbott v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  3. John A. Henneberger v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  4. John A. Henneberger v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  5. John C. Abbott v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API