Legal Opinion · Dissent

John A. Henneberger v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 15, 1968No. 71-67Published

1DissentCollins, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the opinion of the majority in this case.

Prior to the termination of his tour of duty, plaintiff, a commissioned officer in the Naval Reserve with more than 5 years’ continuous service on active duty, made two requests to the Chief of Naval Personnel for additional periods of active duty. The first request was for an active duty agreement for a 1-year period in Hawaii. In his second request plaintiff sought “an active duty agreement for a full regular tour,” without specification of the length of the re*243quested tour, the type of duty, or the place in which he wished…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Estate of J. William Bahen, Deceased, Kathleen Privett Bahen, Sole v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. Francis M. Fix v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  3. Clifford L. Lionberger, D.B.A. Lionberger's Auto Parts v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. Howard Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949
  5. Margaret E. Schellfeffer v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API