Legal Opinion

C.I.T. Corporation v. Seaney

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1938No. Civil No. 4038PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court denying a petition of the C. I. T. Corporation, hereinafter called petitioner, for the reclamation of eighteen Servel refrigerators from the possession of S. W. Seaney, as assignee for the benefit of the creditors of Carl E. Moiling and Herlinda B. Moiling, doing business as Moiling Appliance Company, hereinafter called the company, and from the court’s order denying a new trial.

The facts of the case are not in dispute, and may be stated as follows: Carl E. Moiling and Herlinda B. Moiling for several years last past have been engaged in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. In re Bettman-Johnson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
  3. Moore v. ChilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Bank of Alexandria v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1814
  5. Rio Grande Oil Co. v. Miller Rubber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. C. I. T. Corp. v. Commercial BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Jeffrey C. Stone, Inc. v. Central & Monroe, L.L.C. (In Re Mortgages Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2011
  3. Frazier v. O. S. Stapley Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API