Legal Opinion
AMALGAMATED LOCAL 813, INTERN. U. v. Diebold, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided December 17, 1984No. C84-3816APublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOWD, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Amalgamated Local 813 (the Union), filed the above-captioned action against defendant Diebold Incorporated (Diebold), seeking injunctive relief for alleged violations of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 141 et seq. 1 Before the Court is the Union’s motion for a preliminary injunction, requesting the Court to enjoin Diebold from laying off employees and transferring production equipment from its Wooster, Ohio facility to its Canton, Ohio facility. For the reasons which follow, the motion for a preliminary injunction is denied.
An evidentiary…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- First National Maintenance Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Buffalo Forge Co. v. United SteelworkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Comite Organizador De Trabajadores Agricolas (COTA) (Agricultural Workers Organizing Committee) v. MolinelliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Marine Transport Lines, Inc. v. International Organization of Masters, Mates, & PilotsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- IUE-CWA, Local 628 v. Flowserve Corp. of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 17A v. Superior's Brand Meats, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
- Budhan v. Brightworks Sustainability LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025