Prochazka v. Bee-Three Development, LLC
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtBrandon J. Harrison, Judge
| ¶ This appeal asks whether the parties’ purchase agreement supports at least two reasonable interpretations on when Bee-Three Development, LLC could terminate its agreement with the Prochazkas and scuttle the sale of a commercial lot. If the agreement is not open to varying interpretations, then the Pope County Circuit Court’s summary judgment in favor of Bee-Three Development, LLC may be affirmed. If, however, the contract was open to different reasonable interpretations on the termination question, then the court erred as a matter of law in granting summary judgment.
I
Bee-Three…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Elam v. First Unum Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Keller v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Singletary v. SingletarySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- Fryer v. BoyettCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
- Roberts Contracting Co. v. Valentine-Wooten Road PubLic Facility BoardCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Southern Construction, LLC v. Christopher Caleb HortonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
- Hargis v. HargisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
- E B Mgmt. Co. v. Hous. Specialty Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
- Lisa Murphy; Gregory Kent Thomas; Fiddler's Green Medical Marijuana Dispensary, LLC; And Arkansas Property and Wealth Managmenet Company, LLC v. Ryan Hansen; Jonathan Reeves; Greystone Wellness, LLC; And Hilltop Real Estate Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025
- Farris v. CongerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.