Legal Opinion

Hargis v. Hargis

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 3, 2018No. CV-17-499PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

....

17. The parties each hereby acknowledge that they have been represented by counsel in this matter and that they have each been advised that this agreement, upon approval by the court, will constitute a final agreement of the parties which cannot be reviewed, amended or changed by either party. This result is intended by both parties, so that this matter cannot be subsequently changed by the other. The parties further acknowledge that they are aware of, and have been advised of the Arkansas law with respect to division of property, spousal support (alimony) and other issues related to the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Artman v. HoySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Rainey v. TravisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Prochazka v. Bee-Three Development, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
  4. Thomas v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Franks v. FranksCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hargis v. HargisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  2. Lynn B. Hargis v. Allen HargisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API