Legal Opinion

Haynes Auto Co. v. Turner

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 25, 1916No. 7056PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Quitman — Judge Long. October 11, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

The Haynes Auto Company brought a suit against S. M. Turner upon a written order given to it by him for a touring car. Omitting other parts (which for our present purpose need not be considered), the alleged contract, which desig*23nates itself a “retail order blank,” states that the Haynes Anto Company is authorized to enter Turner’s order for one automobile, for which he agrees to pay the sum of $1,575. He gave to the Haynes Auto Company a check for $250, payable to the “Haynes Automobile Company,” as a cash deposit, liable to be forfeited as liquidated damages if subsequent payment was not…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. De Witt County Public Building Commission v. County of De WittAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Brittain v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  3. Chickamauga Manufacturing Co. v. Augusta Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  4. Palmer-Murphey Co. v. Kimbrough-Veazey Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  5. Burton v. JerniganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API