Legal Opinion

Palmer-Murphey Co. v. Kimbrough-Veazey Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 22, 1923No. 13259; 13300; 13343PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

In each of these cases the plaintiff in error sued the defendant in error upon an alleged breach of a contract which in all material respects is identical with that which was involved in the case of Battle v. Smith, 28 Ga. App. 760 (113 S. E. 235). Each case is brought here upon a bill of exceptions to the sustaining of a demurrer to the petition. In Battle v. Smith, supra, against the same attack as in these cases made, the contract was held to be valid. A petition for the writ of certiorari in that case was by the Supreme Court denied..While, as against any possible future contingencies,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haynes Auto Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  2. Battle v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aspironal Laboratories Inc. v. RosenblattCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. Foy v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API