Legal Opinion

Bates v. Salt Springs National Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 6, 1899Published

Appeals from special term. Actions by Edward P. Bales against Salt Springs National Bank and others, and by Henry W. Millar and others against same defendants. From an order denying a motion to strike out an amended answer in the latter action, certain defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

PER 'CURIAM.

This action, and one in which Edward P. Bates was plaintiff, was commenced in 1892 to foreclose certain mechanics", liens iipon the Masonic Home, near Utica, N. Y. All parties interested in the subject-matter were made parties, either plaintiff or defendant, in one or the other of said actions. The interests of the plaintiffs in each of said actions were conflicting as betweén themselves, and were also conflicting with the interests of the defendants (appellants). Issue was duly joined in each of said actions. Thereafter an order was duly made, upon the consent of all the parties,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bates v. Salt Springs National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Bates v. Salt Springs National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  3. Bates v. Salt Springs Nat. Bank of SyracuseNew York Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API