Legal Opinion

Bates v. Salt Springs Nat. Bank of Syracuse

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from special term, Oneida county. Action by Edward P. Bates and others against the Salt Springs National Bank of Syracuse and others to foreclose mechanics’ liens. From a judgment for plaintiffs (27 N. Y. Supp. 951), defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

On December 5,1890, the firm of Diekison & Allen entered into a contract with the trustees of the Masonic Hall and Asylum Fund for the erection of a Masonic home near Utica. The contract price was $139,500, to be paid in 12 installments, 11 of which were to be made during the progress of the work, and the twelfth, which was the sum of $28,500, was to be paid when the buildings were completely finished and accepted. The contract between the parties also contained the following provision:

“It is also agreed that no payment shall be made hereunder until the said parties of the second part shall…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lauer v. . DunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Stevens v. . OgdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Merchants & Traders' National Bank v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Mechanics & Traders' National Bank v. WinantNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Mechanics & Traders' National Bank v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1879

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bates v. Salt Springs National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Miller v. Salt Springs National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API