Legal Opinion
Fraternal Order of Police, Queen City Lodge No. 69 v. City of Cincinnati
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 8, 2006No. C-050866PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Hildebrandt, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} The city of Cincinnati appeals from the trial court’s order vacating part of a conciliator’s award that resolved a contract dispute between the city and the Fraternal Order of Police (“FOP”). The FOP was representing two separate bargaining units, nonsupervisors and supervisors.
{¶ 2} The parties began negotiations in the fall of 2004 for collective-bargaining agreements to succeed the ones set to expire on December 18, 2004. These negotiations continued for two months, but the parties were unable to resolve differences on a variety of issues. As a result,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Local Union No. 200, United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Warren Education Ass'n v. Warren City Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Lockhart v. American Reserve InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
- Ford Hull-Mar Nursing Home, Inc. v. Marr, Knapp, Crawfis & Associates, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Union Township Board of Trustees v. Fraternal Order of Police, Ohio Valley Lodge No. 112Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Perkins Twp. v. Intl. Assn. of Firefighters, Local 1953Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019