Legal Opinion

Neal v. Bethea

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 23, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

This is an action by the appellant against the appellees, directors of School District No. 36, Bradley County, Arkansas, and George and Ruth Rice, as teachers, and J. R. Quinney as ■ county treasurer. The purpose of the action was to enjoin the issuing and payment of warrants against School District No. 36. The complaint, among other things, alleged that the contract made by M. M. Bethea and W. M. Gorman with George and Ruth Rice, as teachers for the fall and winter term of 1921, was void, because the appellant, who was also a member of the board of directors, had no notice of the meeting of…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Leemon Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  2. Aday v. Chimes School District No. 49Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API