Legal Opinion
Aday v. Chimes School District No. 49
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided January 28, 1946No. 4-7810PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. P. McFaddin, Justice.
This is a controversy between a school district and one of the teachers, and necessitates the determination of the effect, each upon the other, of Act 96 of 1943 and Act 136 of 1943.
On April 14, 1944, appellant, Mrs. Opal Aday, entered into a written contract with the appellee (hereinafter called “District”), whereby appellant taught the school for the district for the full term beginning July 17,1944, and ending March 3,1945. At the time of signing this contract, Mrs. Aday was related to one of the directors (Carl Mathis) within the fourth degree; so, in compliance…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Merchants' Transfer & Warehouse Co. v. GatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Coats v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
- Anthony v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Shipp, for Use v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Carpenter v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Williams v. Pulaski County Election Comm'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Penney v. VessellsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952