Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex Parte Spears

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 30, 1993No. 1920129Published

1Dissent

The majority concludes that Thomas Wayne Spears is not entitled to a writ of mandamus to review the order of the trial judge denying his motion for a new trial, under Rule 15.4, Ala.R.Cr.P., on the question whether the indictment should be dismissed on double jeopardy grounds.

I believe that the majority errs for at least two reasons:(1) Granting the petition would result in a more speedy, inexpensive determination of the merits of the claim. Rule 1, Ala.R.Cr.P., and Rule 1, Ala.R.App.P.; and(2) This Court, by using its supervisory power, has previously reviewed an interlocutory order that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API