Ex Parte Spears
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Dissent
The majority concludes that Thomas Wayne Spears is not entitled to a writ of mandamus to review the order of the trial judge denying his motion for a new trial, under Rule 15.4, Ala.R.Cr.P., on the question whether the indictment should be dismissed on double jeopardy grounds.
I believe that the majority errs for at least two reasons:(1) Granting the petition would result in a more speedy, inexpensive determination of the merits of the claim. Rule 1, Ala.R.Cr.P., and Rule 1, Ala.R.App.P.; and(2) This Court, by using its supervisory power, has previously reviewed an interlocutory order that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.