Legal Opinion

Standish Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 10, 1959No. Appeal, No. 47PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

The appellant here was denied unemployment compensation benefits by the bureau, referee and board on the ground that he was disqualified under the provisions of section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802(e).

This section provides that an employe shall be ineligible for compensation if his unemployment is due to his discharge “for. willful misconduct connected with his work.”

*473The hoard here found that “On April 25, 1958, the claimant approached the night supervisor as he passed through the shop and launched into an unprovoked verbal attack on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walsh v. Penn Anthracite Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Riehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Lavely v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Busfield Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Doheny v. CITY STORESSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Anetakis v. Salvation ArmySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Weckerle Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Boles Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API