Legal Opinion

Yeoman v. Morris

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 4, 1932No. 30,543PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court ivas delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage on an undivided one-half interest in a quarter section of land in Rush county. Broadly speaking, the defense was that the mortgage had been paid by a conveyance of the title to the real property, and that plaintiff, in view of his relations to the parties and the transaction, was not in a position to claim ownership of the mortgage and the note thereby secured. The trial court found generally for plaintiff. Defendant has appealed.

The petition alleges that plaintiff resides at Kansas City, Mo., that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yeamans v. JamesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. Holmes v. CulverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Neihart v. BuekCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ford v. Guarantee Abstract & Title Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Turon State Bank v. BozarthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Rolfsmeyer v. Kansas Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  4. Scott, Administrator v. FarrowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  5. Scott, Administrator v. FarrowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API