Legal Opinion

Neihart v. Buek

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 27, 1931No. 423PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

This is a controversy between client and attorney. The question is, which has the right to redeem from a sale of land under a mortgage foreclosure decree, each claiming to be owner of the equity. The court decided in favor of the client, and the attorney has appealed.

These are the material facts: J. H. Mills, the client, had for many years owned, occupied and cultivated a valuable farm of 325 acres in Osage County, Kansas. He was industrious and frugal, but when he reached the age of about seventy-five years he entered into speculative ventures which left him heavily in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Keenan v. ScottWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Thomas v. Turner's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1890
  3. Yeamans v. JamesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  4. Cunningham v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  5. Ridge v. HealyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Yeoman v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  2. Scott, Administrator v. FarrowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  3. Scott, Administrator v. FarrowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API