Neihart v. Buek
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Circuit Judge.
This is a controversy between client and attorney. The question is, which has the right to redeem from a sale of land under a mortgage foreclosure decree, each claiming to be owner of the equity. The court decided in favor of the client, and the attorney has appealed.
These are the material facts: J. H. Mills, the client, had for many years owned, occupied and cultivated a valuable farm of 325 acres in Osage County, Kansas. He was industrious and frugal, but when he reached the age of about seventy-five years he entered into speculative ventures which left him heavily in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Keenan v. ScottWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
- Thomas v. Turner's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1890
- Yeamans v. JamesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Cunningham v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Ridge v. HealyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Yeoman v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
- Scott, Administrator v. FarrowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
- Scott, Administrator v. FarrowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964