Legal Opinion

Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 3, 1965No. Nos. 18305, 18313PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DANAHER, Circuit Judge:

The Board by its Order E-16285, adopted December 7, 1960, contemplated additional air service between Hawaii and California. Amendments to Western Air Lines route 13 redesignated San Diego as an intermediate point and added Honolulu as a terminal point. Further changes in Western’s route 35 added Honolulu as a terminal point to that route. Nearly three years later, the Board terminated its Transpacific Route Case, proceedings by Order E-20178, served November 8, 1963, and thereafter denied Western’s motion for reconsideration. Western has sought review, contending in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Civil Aeronautics Board v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  4. Northeast Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964
  5. Civil Aeronautics Board v. State Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, United Air Lines, Inc., City of Kansas City, Missouri, Continental Air Lines, Inc., Northwest Airlines, Inc., Pan American World Airways, Inc., Intervenors. The City of San Diego, San Diego Unified Port District, and San Diego Chamber of Commerce v. Civil Aeronautics Board, United Air Lines, Inc., Northwest Airlines, Inc., Pan American World Airways, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API