Legal Opinion

Portnoff v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 25, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

LISA, J.AD.

This appeal requires our determination of whether the collateral source rule, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-6, in the Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act (AICRA), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1 to -35, authorizes a setoff against income continuation benefits, see N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4b, for workers’ compensation total permanent disability benefits, see N.J.S.A. 34:15-12b. The trial judge found no right to the setoff and granted summary judgment in plaintiffs favor against his auto insurance carrier, New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company (NJM). We disagree and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Perez v. Pantasote, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Burbage v. LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
  3. Everhart v. Newark Cleaning & Dyeing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  4. Young v. Western Elec. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. Katz v. Township of HowellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jennifer Lambert and Gary Lambert v. Travelers IndemnityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
  2. N.J. Transit Corp. v. SanchezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
  3. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION, ETC. VS. SANDRA SANCHEZ AND CHAD SMITH (L-8504-16, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
  4. New Jersey Transit Corporation v. Sandra Sanchez and Chad Smith (082292) (Bergen County & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API