Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Newton Division of the District Court Department

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 29, 1993PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A single justice of this court denied without a hearing the plaintiff’s petition under G. L. c. 211, § 3 (1992 ed.). There was no error.

In his petition, the plaintiff has named the Newton Division of the District Court Department, its clerk-magistrate, the two judges of that court and the Chief Justice of the District Court Department as defendants. He seeks an order compelling the District Court to allow him to file applications for criminal complaints and an order to issue process on these complaints.

The plaintiff argues error in the failure of the single justice to grant him a hearing at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Soja v. T. P. Sampson Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Manning v. Municipal Court of the Roxbury DistrictMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Whitley v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McGuinness v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  2. BirchallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  3. McMenimen v. PassatempoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  4. Victory Distributors, Inc. v. Ayer Division of the District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  5. Bradford v. KnightsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API