United States v. Frodenberg
District Court, D. Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, District Judge.
The defendant in this action is charged with conducting a game played with a device known as “Advertoshare” for representatives of value, in violation of section 2032, C. L.A. He was convicted in the justice court for Anchorage precinct, and appealed to this court. The case is submitted for trial by the court without a jury upon stipulated facts and upon briefs.
The Advertoshare is a device of the punchboard variety. It differs from the ordinary punchboard in that, intervening between the punch-out of paper and the possible prize, the player must attempt to solve one of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- D'Orio v. Startup Candy Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1928
- D'Orio v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. RandallOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- State v. LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carll & Ramagosa, Inc. v. AshSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Westerhaus Co. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1956