Legal Opinion
Argroe v. Marinaccio
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 1, 1960PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
63 N.J. Super. 438 (1960)
164 A.2d 809
ADDIE ARGROE, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
FRANK AND CARMEN MARINACCIO, A PARTNERSHIP, T/A MORRIS PLAINS AMOCO SERVICE STATION, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 26, 1960.
Decided November 1, 1960.
Before Judges CONFORD, FOLEY and LEONARD.
Mr. Harry L. Sears argued the cause for petitioner-respondent (Messrs. Young & Sears, attorneys; Mr. William P. Westling, on the brief).
Mr. Arthur F. Mead argued the cause for respondents-appellants (Messrs. Mead, Gleeson, Hansen & Pantages, attorneys).
The opinion of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bryant v. FissellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Tocci v. Tessler & Weiss, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Yurochko v. Beckley Perforating Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
3Cited by4 opinions
- Powers v. Union City Bd. of Ed.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Grace v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1973
- M. & W. Construction Co. v. BuggMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
- Groves v. MarvelSuperior Court of Delaware · 1965