Legal Opinion
Yurochko v. Beckley Perforating Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 15, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
61 N.J. Super. 1 (1960)
160 A.2d 173
PETER YUROCHKO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
BECKLEY PERFORATING CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 8, 1959.
Decided March 15, 1960.
Before Judges PRICE, SULLIVAN and FOLEY.
Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for respondent-appellant.
Mr. Mortimer Wald argued the cause for petitioner-respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by FOLEY, J.A.D.
This is a workmen's compensation case. Respondent appeals from a judgment of the County Court affirming an award in the Workmen's Compensation Division. The issue is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bryant v. FissellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Russo v. United States Trucking Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Tocci v. Tessler & Weiss, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Secor v. Penn Service GarageSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Terlecki v. StraussSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rice v. Pharmaceuticals, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Grace v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1973
- Detlefs v. Town of WestfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
- Argroe v. MarinaccioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Jumpp v. City of VentnorNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002