Richardson v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
APPEAL from Carroll Circuit Court. Hon. J. M. Pittman, Judge. 1. The affidavit and warrant do not charge a public •offense. The charge is of practising medicine without license. 'There is no law requiring license to oractise medicine in this state. Sec. 4641, Mansf. Dig,., only requires registration, and an indictment which does not in some form allege a failure to register charges no offense.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from Carroll Circuit Court. Hon. J. M. Pittman, Judge. 1. The affidavit and warrant do not charge a public •offense. The charge is of practising medicine without license. 'There is no law requiring license to oractise medicine in this state. Sec. 4641, Mansf. Dig,., only requires registration, and an indictment which does not in some form allege a failure to register charges no offense. State v. Fuss ell, 43 Ark., 638. 2. The evidence fails to show that appellant practised medicine in any sense. In State v. Fussell, 43 Ark., 63, the indictment did not ■charge an offense; this case…
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
1. physician : out legislation.
The defendant was charged before a justice of the peace with practising medicine without license. Having been convicted, he appealed to the circuit court, where he was again tried, convicted and fined. He filed a motion for a new trial upon the following grounds': First. That the affidavit (and warrant) did not chárge 'a public offense. Second. That the verdict of the jury was contrary to the weight of evidence. Third. That the verdict was contrary to law. Fourth. That the verdict was contrary to the instructions of the court. Fifth. That the defendant has…
2Cited by13 opinions
- State ex rel. Burroughs v. WebsterIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Twist v. MullinixSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- State v. CreditorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
- Percy v. CockrillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
- Thompson v. Van LearSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.