State v. Creditor
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from, Sedgwiek District Court. At the January term, 1890, E. H. Creditor was convicted of a violation of the law in relation to the practice of dentistry. He appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
E. H. Creditor was convicted in the district court of Sedgwick county for practicing dental surgery without authority, and in violation of the provisions of chapter 123 of the Laws of 1885, entitled “An act to regulate the practice of dentistry, and punish violators thereof.” He appeals, and challenges the validity of the statute. The act provides that it shall be unlawful for any person to practice dentistry or dental surgery without having a diploma from some reputable dental college, school, or university department, in which there was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- State ex rel. Powell v. State Medical Examining BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Eastman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- People v. PhippinMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- State ex rel. Granville v. GregorySupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State ex rel. Milwaukee Medical College v. ChittendenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Graves v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- State Ex Rel. Schneider v. LiggettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
- State ex rel. Kellogg v. CurrensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Ex Parte WhitleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.