Legal Opinion

Jesberg v. Klinger

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 11, 1959No. 41,274, 41,275PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Robb, J.:

The trial court entered its order in each of these appeals sustaining defendant’s general demurrer to plaintiff’s petition and plaintiffs appealed therefrom. The appeals were consolidated for appellate review and we will consider them as one.

The pertinent portions of plaintiff’s petition in brief alleged that defendant at all times was a cotenant of plaintiff and an owner of minerals in place and that plaintiff owned an undivided one seventh interest in such minerals. On August 15, 1955, the county commissioners by their resolution caused a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fry v. DeweesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. AldenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  3. Shell Oil Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  4. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  5. Jinkiaway v. FordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. MatlockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  3. Jesberg v. KlingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  4. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1997
  5. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API