(PC) Green v. Lacebal
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VENCIL C. GREEN, No. 2:21-cv-01636 DC SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 VAL LACEBAL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under
42 U.S.C. § 19
1983. Before the court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 46, 63.) 20 For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends that both motions be denied. 21 BACKGROUND 22 I. Procedural History 23 This case proceeds on plaintiff’s complaint…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.