In re Purdy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the petitioner, Daniel W. Purdy, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of William P. Driscoll, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Westchester on the 14th day of ¡November, 1898, denying the petitioner’s application, and also from an order made at the Westchester Special Term and entered in said clerk’s office on the 14th day of ¡November, 1898, upon which said judgment was entered.
1Opinion of the Court
Woodward, J.:
The petitioner is a neighbor of William P. Driscoll, who is engaged in the liquor business under the provisions of the Liquor Tax Law, and it is .claimed ■ on behalf of the petitioner that the said. William P. Driscoll made certain false statements, sufficient to invalidate his *134liquor tax certificate, in his application for the same.. This proceeding is' brought under the provisions of ¡section 28 of chapter 1,12 •of the Laws of 1896. Upon a hearing of the parties, the'court at Special Term decided that the petitioner had failed to sustain -the allegations made in the petition,…
2Cited by3 opinions
- In re Haight, New York County Courts1901
- In re HaightNew York County Court, Chautauqua County · 1901
- In re SaundersNew York Supreme Court · 1900