Legal Opinion

In re Saunders

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1900Published

1Opinion of the Court

Hash, J.:

There was no building occupied as a dwelling within two hundred feet of the nearest entrance to Garnsey’s premises at the time the certificate was obtained. There was a building in the course of construction within that distance, but it was not and had not been occupied as a dwelling, and could not have been so occupied at that time.

As to the other question, the evidence shows that at the time the certificate was obtained Garnsey had his hotel so far completed that he had the necessary six bedrooms with partitions of the required thickness, but the sash were not in the windows and *263the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re PurdyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API