Legal Opinion

Furman v. Department of Motor Vehicles

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 19, 2002No. H022764PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MESARA, J.

The superior court issued a writ of mandate directing appellant Department of Motor Vehicles (the DMV) to set aside its suspension of respondent John Paul Furman’s driving privilege and reinstate Furman’s driving privilege. The court found that the forensic alcohol analysis submitted by the DMV in support of the suspension was not sufficient competent evidence to support the suspension because it would not have been admissible over a hearsay objection in a civil action. The DMV appeals, claiming that the analysis would have qualified for admission in a civil action under…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Daniels v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Imachi v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Shea v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Molenda v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Gonzalez v. The Vapor Trail CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API