Legal Opinion

Millard v. Millard

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 13, 1951No. Civ. 14542PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

Plaintiff procured a final decree of divorce from defendant in. 1942 by the terms of which plaintiff was awarded the custody of a daughter, Barbara, and defendant the custody of a son, Craig. The decree ordered defendant to pay plaintiff $50 a month for his daughter’s support. Payments were made in full under this decree to January, 1946J but no payments were made thereafter. In October, 1949, plaintiff served and filed a notice of motion for execution on these unpaid instalments, supported by plaintiff’s affidavit. Before this motion was heard plaintiff made an ex parte application for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lohman v. LohmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Di Corpo v. Di CorpoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Wolfe v. WolfeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Cochrane v. CochraneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Wright v. Delta Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1947

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Graham v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Dimarco v. DimarcoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Hunter v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Boyle v. BaggsUtah Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Schreiber v. HookerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API