Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
In Equity. On application by receivers for instructions. On application of Metropolitan Street Railway Company to be made party defendant.
1Opinion of the Court
EACOMBE, Circuit Judge.
Application is made by receivers for instructions of the court as to whether they should appear and participate in the investigation now being conducted by the Public Service Commission touching improvements to be made on the property and in the methods of its operation. It would seem unnecessary for them to do so. Their occupancy of the leased property is but temporary; presumably it will not extend — at least for operation — beyond a year, and it is to be hoped that it may be ended sooner. They are not practical street railroad men, have had only a few days’…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Dickerman v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Blair v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Central Trust Co. v. Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1886
- Park v. New York, L. E. & W. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. New York Rys. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- City of Toledo v. Toledo Rys. & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
- Shuck v. QuackenbushSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
- Harris v. BrownDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1925
- In Re James Butler Grocery Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1935
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.