Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gaylord v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided February 25, 2010No. 2009-5044Published

1DissentNewman, Circuit Judge

The Korean War Veterans Memorial is a work of public art and a national monument. It was authorized by Congress, installed on the National Mall, and paid for by appropriated funds. My colleagues on this panel now hold that the persons who produced this public monument for the United States, under a contract which requires that copyright is in the United States, can nonetheless require the United States to pay damages for copyright infringement based on use of a photograph of the Memorial in snow on a postage stamp. This holding is contrary to the contract provisions, contrary to statute for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Arcadia v. Ohio Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Blanch v. KoonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. Bill Graham Archives v. Dorling Kindersley Limited, Dorling Kindersley Publishing, Inc. And Rr Donnelley & Sons Company, Docket No. 05-2514-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API