Legal Opinion

State v. White

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 26, 1963No. File No. CR 12-2027PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKosicki, J.

The defendant has appealed from a conviction of wilfully evading payment of a bridge toll in violation of § 13-100. In lieu of a finding, the facts have been stipulated but not made part of the record by the court. This does not constitute a finding of facts as required by our rules. State v. Cohn, 24 Conn. Sup. 232, 235; Phoenix Ins. Co. v. Carey, 80 Conn. 426, 434. There was a trial in this case, and a transcript of the evidence has been filed. The appeal should have been accompanied by a finding of facts by the trial court. Counsel cannot usurp the function of the court and determine, by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Phoenix Ins. Co. v. CareySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  2. State v. CohnConnecticut Superior Court · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Doe v. MarselleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  2. State v. TobeyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API