Bell v. Washington Cedar Shingle Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Cowrt, Whatcom County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hoyt, J.
— This action was brought to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been occasioned by the negligence of the defendant. The negligence charged was, that the defendant had provided imperfect machinery and appliances, and had put plaintiff to work in connection therewith without his being in any manner informed of the nature and use of the same. Plaintiff was allowed to show that, after the accident, changes had been made in such machinery and appliances. Proper exceptions were taken by the defendant to the introduction of such testimony,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Morse v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. ClemIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HennesseyTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Corcoran v. . Village of PeekskillNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. CartledgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Erickson v. E. J. McNeeley & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
- Hatcher v. Globe Union Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
- Town of Douglas v. NielsenWyoming Supreme Court · 1965
- Hatcher v. Globe Union Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.